Event: Computer-Implemented Inventions - Monday 8 Oct 2018

This Kat has just learned of an event on Monday evening which will be of interest to London based readers interested in inventions in the field of computing. 
Hosted by Queen Mary University of London at Kilburn & Strode's offices at Lacon London, the event involves presentations from the technical board of appeal responsible for examining appeals in the fields of computing and computer-implemented inventions.  The board will present on recent case law developments and topics include "Debating the Line between Technical and Non-Technical Matter" and "Technical Contribution in a User Interface". Q&A and drinks to follow. 

This is an unprecedented (if short notice) opportunity to meet the entire EPO computer-implemented inventions Board of Appeal.  Ticket bookings and further details can be found here.









Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Singapore Is Fast-Tracking FinTech Patent Applications (and making more "Crazy Rich Asians"?)

Image
A leading banker in this Kat's national backyard observed last week that conventional banks that ignore FinTech do so at their long-term peril. Ahead of the curve is Singapore, a world center for banking. Kat friend Constance Leong describes how Singapore is implementing fast track protection of FinTech patent applications. The box-office smash hit, "Crazy Rich Asians" , is on everyone’s lips (and social media feeds) nowadays. The Singapore-set Hollywood movie, featuring an all-Asian cast, comically peers into the lives of the one-percenters strutting their stuff in famously up-market Singapore. Love it or hate it, the movie nails one thing for sure: Singapore is a playground for the financially savvy; a haven for financial technology (commonly known as “ FinTech ”). In this spirit, the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (“IPOS”) has launched a fast-track patent scheme determined to accelerate innovation for finance sector inventions. This one-year scheme, ...
Read more

ECtHR rules that prohibiting linking to defamatory content might be freedom of expression violation: what implications (if any) for copyright?

Image
Kat li ck nking Can linking to protected content be considered an infringement of IP rights, at certain conditions? As far as copyright is concerned, this is a question that - further to the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European (CJEU) in cases like Svensson   [Katposts here ] and GS Media [Katposts here ] - has a response in the affirmative in the EU. But is it possible that envisaging liability for acts of linking might be a violation of the link provider's own human rights, notably freedom of expression under Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR)? This is the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to consider in Magyar Jeti Zrt v Hungary .  Today, this court answered the question in the affirmative, at least in relation to linking to defamatory content. Let's see how the ECtHR reasoned, before turning to the potential implications for IP and, in particular, copyright. Background The applicant company, which operates ...
Read more

Double trouble: fresh CJEU reference from Swedish Supreme Court regarding scope of communication to the public inside cars

Image
Swedish Collective Management Organisation (STIM) and the Swedish Artists’ and Musicians’ Interest Organisation (SAMI) brought two separate proceedings against two companies that operate in the automobile leasing/renting industry. Both cases followed missed payment (since 2014) of yearly licensing fees to STIM and SAMI, and they are currently pending before the Swedish Supreme Court. This has now decided to stay the proceedings, and ask the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to clarify the scope of communication to the public in Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29 (InfoSoc Directive) and Article 8(2) of the Directive 2006/115 (the Rental Rights Directive).  The first case was brought by STIM against Fleetmanager, a company that leases vehicles, primarily to companies. The cars are equipped with built-in radio systems and are usually rented out to customers for a period of 29 days or less (short-term hire).  The second case was brought by SAMI against Nordisk Bilu...
Read more